UAF uses 11 grade tiers on a 4-point scale. It has operated in Faisalabad since 1906.
There are 11 grade tiers. D is the floor, at 1 point.
The figure below is arithmetic. No policy backs it. A CGPA times 25 (normalization only) gives a percentage-shaped number. That number is an estimate. No UAF-issued conversion formula was found.
A few numbers decide whether you graduate. The missing piece is the marks table, and its absence is the reason we will not print a percentage here. GPA method runs to Total quality points ÷ semester credit hours. CGPA method runs to Total quality points ÷ cumulative credit hours.
Check the figure against your own grade report before it matters. Our version follows the written policy. Practice in a faculty office can differ.
| GPA method | Total quality points ÷ semester credit hours |
| CGPA method | Total quality points ÷ cumulative credit hours |
| Scale | 4.00-point quality-point framework |
| Conversion | No universal official CGPA→percentage formula verified |
UAF explicitly publishes the GPA and CGPA quality-point formulas: GPA is total quality points per semester divided by semester credit hours, while CGPA uses total quality points from the first through the current semester divided by total credit hours. The exact letter-grade table can vary by the applicable UAF rules/programme; Gradometer uses the institution’s 4.0 quality-point framework and avoids inventing a CGPA-to-percentage formula.
| Grade | Points | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| A | 4.00 | Excellent |
| A- | 3.67 | Very Good |
| B+ | 3.33 | Good |
| B | 3.00 | Above Average |
| B- | 2.67 | Average |
| C+ | 2.33 | Satisfactory |
| C | 2.00 | Pass |
| C- | 1.67 | Marginal Pass |
| D+ | 1.33 | Poor |
| D | 1.00 | Minimum Pass |
| F | 0.00 | Fail |
The scale is in the table above, taken directly from the UAF source we cite. The source document is linked at the top of this page if you want to read the original wording.
There is no direct route unless UAF publishes one. A converted percentage looks precise and is not.
Credit-weighted, as at most institutions. Each grade point is multiplied by the course's credit hours, the results are summed, and the total is divided by credits attempted. A naive average of grade points gives the wrong answer at UAF whenever course credits differ.