The official grade-to-point mapping, how it is applied, and where it comes from.
The cited source is programme/faculty material where indicated; Gradometer does not assume that every faculty and cohort has identical rules.
Conversion shown: No official universal CGPA-to-percentage formula verified
| Grade | Points | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| A+ | 4.20 | — |
| A | 4.00 | — |
| A- | 3.70 | — |
| B+ | 3.30 | — |
| B | 3.00 | — |
| B- | 2.70 | — |
| C+ | 2.30 | — |
| C | 2.00 | — |
| C- | 1.50 | — |
| D | 1.00 | — |
| Grading mode | Absolute percentage-to-grade framework |
| GPA scale | 0.00 – 4.20 |
| CGPA → percentage status | No official universal formula verified |
Credit-weighted, as at most institutions. Each grade point is multiplied by the course's credit hours, the results are summed, and the total is divided by credits attempted. A naive average of grade points gives the wrong answer at UoM whenever course credits differ.
Not from the grading table alone. Gradometer keeps grade assignment separate from reverse CGPA-to-percentage conversion unless an official formula is verified. The linked source is where each grade point in that table came from.