Relative grading is the fact that changes everything else at Uo Management and Technology. There is no fixed marks table, because the cohort sets the boundaries every semester. It has been running in Lahore since 1990.
There are 9 grade tiers. C- is the floor, at 1.7 points. Note what is missing. D does not appear on this scale, so there is nothing between the last pass and a fail.
What you see here is a computed percentage, not an official position. A CGPA times 25 (mathematical normalization; not an official conversion formula) gives a percentage-shaped number. That number is an estimate. No Uo Management and Technology-issued conversion formula was found.
An honest gap. The practical consequence is that a Uo Management and Technology letter grade means little without the cohort it came from. Rules can vary by programme, degree level or cohort; consult the current official regulation before formal use, and no source we trust closes it yet.
Check the figure against your own grade report before it matters. Published policy is what we read here, and departments sometimes work to their own version.
| Location | Lahore, Pakistan |
| Grading mode | relative |
| Maximum GPA | 4.00 |
| Source confidence | High — official institutional source |
| CGPA → percentage | Mathematical normalization only unless an official purpose-specific formula is published |
| Verification date | August 30, 2026 |
We publish these openly rather than filling them with guesses. Help us close one.
The cited UMT handbook applies to graduate-level participants and states that grading is based on relative norms. It provides the 4.0 grade-point scale and excludes P, I, W, S, NC, AU and IP from ordinary grade-point calculation. UMT grades relatively and publishes grade points without percentage equivalents, so no band table exists to record.
| Grade | Points | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| A+/A | 4.00 | — |
| A- | 3.70 | — |
| B+ | 3.30 | — |
| B | 3.00 | — |
| B- | 2.70 | — |
| C+ | 2.30 | — |
| C | 2.00 | — |
| C- | 1.70 | — |
| F | 0.00 | — |
Multiply each course grade point by its credit hours, add the resulting quality points, and divide by the relevant total credit hours. Use the university-specific grade points rather than a generic scale.
In shape, yes. In detail, no. Uo Management and Technology sets its own boundaries, and those are what decide your letter.
Ask the Uo Management and Technology examination office for an equivalence certificate. That document is what an employer or foreign registrar will accept, and a multiplier is not.
Your programme's rules take precedence. Check them at Uo Management and Technology rather than assuming the general case applies to you.