The official grade-to-point mapping, how it is applied, and where it comes from.
The cited UMT handbook applies to graduate-level participants and states that grading is based on relative norms. It provides the 4.0 grade-point scale and excludes P, I, W, S, NC, AU and IP from ordinary grade-point calculation. UMT grades relatively and publishes grade points without percentage equivalents, so no band table exists to record.
Conversion shown: CGPA × 25 (mathematical normalization; not an official conversion formula)
| Grade | Points | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| A+/A | 4.00 | — |
| A- | 3.70 | — |
| B+ | 3.30 | — |
| B | 3.00 | — |
| B- | 2.70 | — |
| C+ | 2.30 | — |
| C | 2.00 | — |
| C- | 1.70 | — |
| F | 0.00 | — |
| Location | Lahore, Pakistan |
| Grading mode | relative |
| Maximum GPA | 4.00 |
| Source confidence | High — official institutional source |
| CGPA → percentage | Mathematical normalization only unless an official purpose-specific formula is published |
| Verification date | August 30, 2026 |
Multiply each course grade point by its credit hours, add the resulting quality points, and divide by the relevant total credit hours. Use the university-specific grade points rather than a generic scale.
In shape, yes. In detail, no. Uo Management and Technology sets its own boundaries, and those are what decide your letter.
Ask the Uo Management and Technology examination office for an equivalence certificate. That document is what an employer or foreign registrar will accept, and a multiplier is not.
Your programme's rules take precedence. Check them at Uo Management and Technology rather than assuming the general case applies to you.